News of the arrival of a bobblehead doll in the likeness (sort of, if you only consider the black suit and yellow tie) of retiring University of Akron president Luis Proenza may foretell a new era in which these novelties will become the traditional gold watches once handed out for long years of service.
Not that the sparkling watch will be missed by Proenza, who will be leaving with a future adequately sustained by a golden parachute that could have easily covered the school's enormous debt. Bon voyage
* * * * *
One of the highlights of the past week's cable shows was the appearance of neocon mogul William Kristol on Bill Maher's Friday evening show. When Maher asserted that much of the opposition to President Obama was the result of his being a black man in the White House, we got a less genteel version of the usually suave, smirking Kristol seething in a voice-over: "That's bullshit. That's bullshit!"
Well, now. Is that any way for a pompous pundit to talk? Yet here he was, fuming as the profound sage who has erred so often in facts and judgment that the New York Times was forced to rid itself of his column. Two egregious ones come readily to mind: a hawkish, Cheney-like defense of America's invasion of Iraq that he guaranteed would bring enormous glory to the U.S.; and his burdensome influence in recruiting Sarah Palin as John McCain's veep candidate.
But Kristol will continue to present himself with that self-satisfied smirk and his followers will bow in appreciative genuflection. In the gated realm of Kristol 's conservatism, errors of fact don't matter that much.
* * * * *
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has reversed a decision by Federal Judge John
Adams in the suit by then-Stow firefighter Anthony Rorrer against the city of Stow. Rorrer based his suit on a serious eye injury suffered in an accident, blinding him in one eye. Adams dismissed the suit. However, the appellate court questioned Adams' handling of the case. In a rare rebuke, the appellate court "actually misconstrued its own discovery order" with apparent bias toward Rorrer and remanded the case to the district court, calling for another other judge to hear it.
* * * * *
Who knew? Rush Limbaugh came on in another racial burst after "12 years a Slave" won the Best Film Oscar. Rush said the picture won only because slave is a "magic word". Anybody remember how Rush downgraded a black NFL quarterback by accusing sportswriters of promoting African American QBs. (As I recall, a black QB led Seattle to a Super Bowl championship a few months ago.) Isn't it time that we stop referring to this crowd as the "far right" and call it instead the "far wrong"?
Showing posts with label Bill Maher. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bill Maher. Show all posts
Monday, March 3, 2014
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
Maher vs. Coulter: Box-office ideologies
HAVE YOU been following the reports on the series of staged debates between two otherwise cordial drinking buddies: Ann Coulter and Bill Maher? They are pitted in forensic combat as the gingham dog and calico cat of the nation's ideological wars. But anyone interested in such political nonsense was asked to pay pre-recession prices of $38 to $200 per ticket for the three left-right encounters this week in the Wang Theatre in New York. (The series was pretentiously named "The Minds That Moved the World" although at this distance I feel terribly stationary by an artificially inseminated "news" event. What they don't think of these days!
It was only natural for some of us to immediately invoke the historical gravity of the seven Lincoln-Douglas senatorial campaign debates that expressed their profound and nation-wrenching differences on slavery. Fortunately, neither Coulter nor Maher, comedians on different pages, has announced any interest in running for the U.S. Senate. We can only hope they never will.
This latest venture into rhetorical survival is, of course, box-office puffery. By now, anybody with a wisp of interest in politics already knows where Coulter and Maher come down on the issues without an expensive front-row theatre seat. Besides, Maher has often said that he likes Coulter and that (Heavens!) they are good friends. I'm sure the feeling is mutual and the beer was especially refreshing after the show.
But this is only the beginning of the little side shows by the sponsors, aptly Madison Square Garden Entertainment. Next up is James Carville vs. Karl Rove, May 27, with Charlie Rose as the ringmaster. Or Arianna Huffington vs. Tucker Carlson, April 1.
I think we're being hustled, folks, and will say no more unless we find out that Maher proposed to Coulter over a glass of Guinness. But I'm jaded. I get my kicks from pro football and will leave the media wrestlers to their own transparent show-biz schemes. Maybe an Australian tag-team match with Limbaugh, O'Reilly or Matthews pawing in the corners?
Labels:
Alberto Gonzalez,
Ann Coulter,
Bill Maher,
debates,
Huffington
Monday, February 16, 2009
Maher: There are steroids in all of us
THE STIR OVER superstar Alex Rodriquez's bout with steroids has drawn the attention of Bill Maher, TV panel host, comedian and sideline medical expert. Maher told Larry King that he wasn't all that concerned about athletes who have built their biceps with hormones because all human beings are subjected to the same abuse. "We're all on growth hormones," says Maher, who points out that domestic livestock, the stuff that shows up on our dinner plates, are loaded with them. "If you've eaten chicken...you're on growth hormones." Unfortunately, they still don't help most people to understand the infield fly rule. '
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)