Well, none of that mutual admiration stuff is all that newsworthy. But Think Progress has now alertly pointed out that none of the warm and fuzzy Bush-bonding appears in Portman's official campaign website. In fact, Bush's name never appears. I hurriedly glanced at the site earlier today before rushing off on another matter. It confirmed the initial report by Think Progress. . However, when I checked again tonight for this post, it was gone with the explanation, "page not found."
Where did it go? Things have a way of disappearing, not the least of which is any reference to Bush. Did Portman enjoy preferred status through divine intervention, or did he really get the job from Bush? That will come later in the campaign - from Portman's political opponents whether he likes it or not, probably even more so now that he has shown such guarded sensitivity to his previous line of work.
3 comments:
Portman will claim using Bush is a "desperate" manuever from people who "have no ideas and are looking towards the past and not the future." Then he will say that he is the candidate that borrows from Reagan.
By the time of the 2010 election, people will be so fed up with Obama, Pelosi, Reid, and Strickland's Shenanigans that they will be wishing for the days of Bush.
Be careful about what you wish for, my friend. You may be unlucky enough to get it.
Post a Comment