Showing posts with label Pittsburgh Pirates. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pittsburgh Pirates. Show all posts
Monday, May 9, 2011
Break up the Pirates before they capture the what?
ALLOW ME to write hurriedly about a celebration, however brief it might be, of the Pittsburgh Pirates reaching the .500 mark on Sunday. What's so great about that? This is the latest in the season that they reached that honored mission since June 11, 2005. The team, such as it has been, has not had a winning season since 1992 and will break the record held by the Phillies if they again finish under .500 this year. (The Bucs obviously learn nothing from the Steelers.) Even the Indians have had the pleasure of losing playoff games during the past 17 seasons. Well, as a long suffering Pirate fan who used to slip into Rosie Roswell's office to watch him recreate games on the ticker, I'm happy. But as I mentioned , I wrote this quickly. They play the Dodgers tonight and could easily fall under .500 again. But I can still say I knew them when...
Saturday, April 11, 2009
Cleveland Indians: 0-162?
BASEBALL IS NOTHING if it isn't acres of statistical projections. So as a Pirates fan well adjusted to losing seasons, I think it's important to note that the Cleveland Indians have opened the season with five losses and nary a win. Based on my carefully researched theory of relativity between the Pirates and Indians, if you project the Tribe's 0-5 record to date, it would be fair to project the possibility that the team will lose all of its 162 games this year. Of course, if it happens to win tomorrow's game, it improves the final projection to a more socially acceptable 26-136. (I may be off a game or two because I'm not good at math.) Never lose hope even if your team is forever losing games. I hope this is helpful to get you through the remaining cold days of spring until you can get out into the yard to project the grubs that will strike next.
Sunday, April 5, 2009
Another season, another woe...
IT WOULD BE unlike me not to take note of the opening of a new Major League Baseball season today. In this troubled world, it should be a national holiday to hail the unequaled equality of the moment. As minor philosophers have often observed, all of the teams have the same record before the first increasingly expensive pitch is thrown. Such equilibrium is not lost on such Pittsburgh fans as I, whose Pirates modestly aspire not to pennants but to a .500 season, a plateau that the team has not accomplished since James Buchanan. Or was it Grover Cleveland? No matter. We savor our moment, as brief as a flash of lightning, before the first nine innings have expired. After that, we start assessing the rookies at Altoona for a glimpse of next year's possibilities. It is precisely at this moment that we feel the pain of the Cleveland Browns fans, but not for long.
For Pittsburghers, it is the best of times and the worst of times. The Steelers' uncommon successes should more than make up for the Pirates' uncommon (horrific ?) failures. Maybe that contradiction in outcomes could sustain us until ...oh, the middle of June, when speculation begins in earnest on another Steelers winning season to offset the Pirates' firm hold on last place. To those who tell me that the truth always lies at the midpoint between the two extremes, I say, "The hell it does.!" The Steelers played 19 games last season to claim the Super Bowl; the Pirates, 162 to claim the cellar. Where is the emotional equity in those numbers?
But to give baseball its due, it should be recalled that the game was once known as "Our National Pastime" before it was replaced with Twittering. I know nothing about Twittering - until yesterday I didn't even know how to use it in a simple declarative sentence - but I do know that a runner cannot go from first base to third without touching second and that the infield fly rule has nothing to do with insects. For those insights, and the little figurine of Roberto Clemente that stands on the shelf above my desk, I will honor the opening of a new season with the not quite exhausted patience of Job while forlornly conceding once again, "No, we can't!".
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)